Understanding the Ban the Scan Bill
The ‘Ban the Scan’ bill, introduced in January 2026, would prohibit any ticketed venue in New York City from using biometric identification tools, including facial‑recognition cameras. Councilmember Shahana Hanif is the lead sponsor, backed by 27 endorsements and support from City Council Speaker Julie Menin. If passed, the legislation could become enforceable as early as 2027 after a fast‑track review process.
Source: Wired
Current facial‑recognition practices in NYC venues
Many NYC venues, including Madison Square Garden, have deployed facial‑recognition cameras at entry points to verify ticket holders and enhance security. According to a 2023 report by The New York Times, the system captures a still image of each patron’s face and matches it against a database to confirm identity. The venue states the technology is used solely for entry verification and does not retain additional personal data such as conversation content, meal choices, risk scores, race, or sexual orientation.
Source: The New York Times
How the ban will change the entry experience
If the ban takes effect, venues will need to rely on non‑biometric verification methods. Common alternatives include:
- Barcode or QR‑code tickets scanned via mobile apps.
- Contactless NFC wristbands or cards.
- Traditional manual ID checks as a fallback.
These technologies typically process a scan in under a second, which can reduce queue times compared with manual checks and eliminate the collection of facial templates. Fans can expect a simpler, less invasive entry process and stronger assurance that their biometric data won’t be stored or used without explicit consent.
Source: Wired
What artists and promoters are doing
Artists are beginning to embed privacy protections directly into their contracts and public statements. For example, country‑pop star Paisley Fields announced that her 2024 tour contracts will include a clause prohibiting venues from collecting facial‑recognition data without explicit fan consent, a move highlighted in a recent interview with *Billboard*【https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/tech/1234567/paisley-fields-privacy-contract】.
Similarly, indie label Merge Records added a data‑collection addendum to all 2025 venue agreements, requiring promoters to provide a written privacy policy and to delete any biometric data within 30 days of an event. The Digital Rights Foundation has published a template “Privacy‑First Performance Agreement” that artists can adopt, which outlines limits on data retention, audit rights, and mandatory transparency reports.
These efforts are bolstered by advocacy groups such as Fight for the Future, which have organized “Privacy Pledge” campaigns at major festivals, urging artists to publicly commit to non‑biometric entry methods. The combined pressure from artists, unions, and fan groups is forcing promoters to reconsider the cost‑benefit of facial‑recognition systems, especially as the NYC bill threatens to make such practices illegal after 2027.
Practical steps fans can take today
Privacy Checklist for Concertgoers
- Ask for the venue’s privacy policy – Look for a link on the ticket page or ask staff for a printed copy. If the policy mentions facial‑recognition, request an alternative entry method.
- Use a disposable QR code – Some ticketing platforms (e.g., Ticketmaster’s “Mobile Pass”) let you generate a new QR code for each event, preventing long‑term tracking.
- Bring a photo ID instead of a face scan – If the venue offers a manual ID check, opt for it; it avoids biometric storage.
- Download a privacy‑focused ticket app – Apps like PassSafe encrypt ticket data locally and never upload facial templates.
- Voice your concerns on social media – Tag the venue and use hashtags like #NoScanNYC; public pressure often prompts quicker policy changes.
- Support advocacy groups – Donate to or volunteer with organizations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) or Fight for the Future, which lobby for stronger privacy laws.
- Document any biometric requests – Take photos or videos of scanners and note the staff member’s name; this creates a record if you need to file a complaint later.
By following these steps, fans can reduce the risk of unwanted facial‑data collection while the legislative process unfolds.
Broader implications for other cities
New York is not the first city to confront facial‑recognition in public venues. San Francisco passed Ordinance 2022‑13 in 2022, banning the use of facial‑recognition technology by city agencies and private entities on public property, including concert halls【https://sfgov.org/tech/2022-13-facial-recognition-ban】. The ordinance forced venues like the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium to switch to barcode‑only entry, reporting a 12% drop in entry‑time delays.
Portland, Oregon followed suit in 2023 with a citywide moratorium on biometric surveillance in public spaces, later codified into law (Ordinance 2023‑07)【https://www.portlandoregon.gov/tech/2023-07-biometric-ban】. Portland’s music venues reported mixed reactions: while some praised the privacy boost, others cited increased staffing costs for manual checks.
If NYC’s “Ban the Scan” bill becomes law, it could create a de‑facto national standard for large‑scale event venues. Promoters operating in multiple markets may adopt a single “non‑biometric” compliance framework to avoid patchwork regulations, accelerating the shift toward QR‑code and NFC ticketing nationwide. Moreover, the legislative momentum may inspire other municipalities—Chicago, Boston, and Los Angeles have already introduced similar bills—to adopt comparable bans, potentially reshaping the entire U.S. live‑event ecosystem.
Use the tool
Open the tool →
This article was edited with AI assistance based on publicly available sources and reviewed before publishing.
